West Chicago teacher forced out over two-word "Go ICE" post speaks out: 'Professionally and personally devastating.'

By 
, February 15, 2026 
Category:

James Heidorn spent 14 years as a physical education teacher at Gary Elementary School in West Chicago, Illinois. He lost it all over two words on Facebook.

Heidorn is speaking publicly for the first time about the emotional and financial wreckage left behind after he was pushed out of his job for posting "Go ICE" on his personal Facebook page — a response to a news story about a local police department agreeing to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

The sequence of events that ended his career moved with a speed that should alarm anyone who believes personal opinions expressed off the clock still belong to the person who holds them.

Two Words, One Career

On January 22, school officials contacted Heidorn about growing social media chatter over the post. He met with HR staff and, under pressure, briefly quit — then rescinded his resignation the same day. He was set to return to school that Monday while the district investigated.

He never made it back.

Before any investigation concluded, West Chicago Mayor Daniel Bovey posted a Facebook video explaining why Heidorn's comment was "hurtful" and "offensive." Over the weekend, parents encouraged each other online to keep students home from school in protest. On January 26, the city held a "listening session" — complete with a Spanish translator — at Bovey's request. Attendees declared that "kids do not feel safe" and that Heidorn's two-word post was "cruel."

Illinois Democratic State Sen. Karina Villa piled on, expressing "unwavering solidarity" with families upset by what she called "disturbing comments reportedly made by an educator."

Heidorn ultimately resigned a second time rather than face termination after a hearing with school officials. He also lost a coaching position at a nearby private school. Going forward, he'll be required to disclose to any future school district that he resigned — and explain why.

The Question Nobody Will Answer

Fox News Digital asked West Chicago Elementary School District 33 a straightforward question: What rule did James Heidorn violate? The district did not respond.

They also asked whether a teacher who publicly opposed ICE — or, say, antagonized federal agents — would face the same consequences. Again, silence.

That silence tells you everything. The district labeled Heidorn's post "disruptive" and acknowledged the situation "raised concerns and caused disruption for students, families, and staff." But disruption is not a policy violation. Community anger is not evidence of wrongdoing. And a two-word expression of support for a federal law enforcement agency, posted on a personal account, directed at no student or family, doesn't become misconduct just because it made people uncomfortable.

Heidorn put it plainly:

"This started with a two-word comment on my personal Facebook page supporting law enforcement—nothing more. It wasn't directed at any student, family or school community. Second, I was placed on leave and faced intense pressure before any full investigation or fair process could play out, with this it led to my resignation."

The Double Standard That Governs Public Education

Consider the contrast. In recent weeks, teachers across the country have taken to the streets to protest President Trump's immigration enforcement policies. In Chicago, teachers stormed a local Target and harassed employees during one such demonstration — without facing pushback or repercussions from local school districts.

Teachers who march against federal immigration law? Protected expression. A teacher who posts two words supporting federal immigration law? Career over.

Heidorn sees the asymmetry clearly:

"It does feel like a double standard—due to my viewpoint being different from others within the community that I taught in. I feel that we should all be able to coexist with our personal political viewpoints. Fairness should apply equally, regardless of those viewpoints. If personal political speech is grounds for punishment, it should be consistent—not selective based on what side you're on."

And then there's State Sen. Villa, who declared solidarity against a teacher's personal Facebook post — the same Karina Villa who was captured on video in September chasing down ICE agents in the street. Apparently, physically confronting federal law enforcement officers is principled civic engagement. Typing "Go ICE" is grounds for professional destruction.

The Mayor's Convenient Democracy

Mayor Bovey's response framed the entire affair as the democratic process functioning normally:

"The teacher used his First Amendment rights to make a statement. Others used their First Amendment rights in commenting on the situation. The school board took appropriate action to go through the due process of investigating a situation which had adversely impacted the education of children. The public used their First Amendment rights to comment (in favor and against) the actions of the school board and then the teacher made a decision to resign. At the end of the day, though there were frustrations on both sides, which were stoked by inaccurate social media posts, this is how democracy works."

That's a neat trick — laundering a mob action through the vocabulary of civics. Yes, technically, everyone exercised their rights. But Bovey himself injected political pressure into an active investigation by posting his video before the district had finished its review. He requested the listening session that turned community anxiety into organized outrage. He framed a PE teacher's Facebook comment as someone "cavalierly rooting on" events that "traumatized" children — as if typing two words on a personal page is the moral equivalent of conducting immigration enforcement.

What Was Lost

Strip away the politics for a moment and look at what actually happened to a human being. A man who earned a master's degree in educational leadership because he wanted to become the best teacher he could be — who defined himself by the profession — was denied any chance to say goodbye to his students.

"Third, I lost my career, my income and the chance to close out my time with my students properly—no farewell, no goodbyes."

His message to those students carried the weight of someone who understands what was taken from both sides of that classroom door:

"To my students: I want you to know that I care about you deeply and always have. The person you knew in class—the one who encouraged you, played with you and cheered you on—is still the same person. I always tried to provide the best learning environment and great atmosphere for us all to grow."

A GoFundMe page describes him as a "beloved physical education teacher" who "showed up every day for his students." Whatever one thinks of his Facebook post, no one has disputed that characterization of his actual teaching.

The Precedent That Should Terrify Every Teacher

Heidorn identified the stakes beyond his own situation with precision:

"Most importantly, this is bigger than me: it's about whether personal opinions expressed outside of work can cost someone their livelihood without due process. I hope to see free speech matters, even when it's unpopular."

He's right. If expressing support for a federal law enforcement agency on your personal social media — off campus, off the clock, directed at no one in particular — can destroy a 14-year career in public education, then the boundaries of acceptable thought for teachers have narrowed to a political monoculture. The only opinions that survive are the ones the local power structure shares.

The district never stated what rule Heidorn broke. They never explained what standard applies. They never answered whether the same consequences would befall a teacher on the other side of the issue. That's not due process. That's a political litmus test administered after the fact, with the answer key written by whoever shows up angriest.

Heidorn doesn't know what comes next. Teaching, he said, is all he ever wanted to do — all he ever studied for. Now he'll spend the rest of his professional life explaining why he resigned from a job he loved, over two words that millions of Americans would say without a second thought.

"I really don't know what is next for me, as the teaching profession has been, up to this point in time, all that I ever wanted to do."

Fourteen years, a master's degree, and a career built on showing up for kids every day. Erased — not by misconduct, not by incompetence, not by any failure in the classroom. By two words on a Facebook page that committed the unforgivable sin of agreeing with federal law.

About Sadie Smith

From campaign chaos to late-breaking developments, Sadie covers politics with speed and clarity. She focuses on what’s happening right now, how it got there, and why readers should care. The goal is simple: useful political coverage without the lectures.

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox