Trump says final decision on possible strike on Iran remains pending

By 
 updated on June 19, 2025

President Donald Trump is keeping the world guessing on Iran. He’s mulling U.S. involvement in Israel’s strikes against Iranian nuclear sites but hasn’t committed, preferring to decide “one second before it’s due,” as the New York Post reports. This calculated suspense underscores his unpredictable yet strategic approach. 

Trump’s national security team met Wednesday in the Situation Room to weigh options, as Israel launched attacks Friday targeting Iran’s nuclear scientists and military officials. The president, aware of the attack date, had given Iran 60 days to negotiate uranium enrichment limits. Diplomacy now hangs by a thread.

“I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven’t made a final,” Trump said. His knack for last-minute decisions frustrates the woke establishment, who crave predictable capitulation. Yet, this fluidity keeps adversaries off balance.

Israel strikes, Trump watches

Israel’s Friday assault zeroed in on Iran’s nuclear program, a bold move Trump tacitly endorsed. He noted Iran’s top officials want White House talks but can’t leave Tehran amid the strikes. Progressives might call this chaos; conservatives see leverage.

“They want to come to the White House. I may do that,” Trump quipped. His openness to diplomacy, even after Israel’s attack, exposes the left’s obsession with endless sanctions over practical solutions.

Trump’s briefings with his national security team have been relentless, dissecting intelligence on the week-long conflict. A White House official boasted, “Everyone is ready to execute his decision.” This decisiveness contrasts sharply with the Biden era’s dithering.

Fordow facility looms large in deliberations

The Fordow nuclear facility, buried deep in a mountain, is the real prize. Trump is evaluating whether Israel can destroy it alone or if U.S. muscle is needed. He’s not tipping his hand, keeping Iran guessing.

“We’re the only ones that have the capability to do it,” Trump said. He quickly added, “but that doesn’t mean I’m going to do it.” This restraint mocks the left’s caricature of him as a reckless war hawk.

Trump’s hesitation isn’t cowardice but strategy. He’s weighing whether U.S. involvement is worth escalating a conflict Israel’s already handling. The anti-war crowd should be cheering, but they’re too busy clutching pearls.

Diplomacy or destruction?

Iran’s nuclear ambitions are the core issue. Trump is clear: “If it’s a choice between them fighting or having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do.” His pragmatism cuts through the fog of progressive moralizing.

Yet, he’s not itching for a fight. “I’m not looking to fight,” he emphasized, signaling openness to a deal if Iran plays ball. This balance of strength and restraint exposes the weakness of globalist handwringing.

Israel’s strikes have made diplomacy trickier, but Trump’s still open to talks. Iranian officials, pinned down by Israel’s attacks, face a tough road to the negotiating table. The left’s dream of endless U.N. summits looks increasingly naive.

Trump’s genius at work

Trump’s approach -- deliberate yet flexible -- keeps allies and enemies on edge. “We add a certain amount of genius to everything,” he boasted, and the results speak for themselves. Israel’s doing the heavy lifting, while America stays poised.

The White House official’s confidence -- “He calls play, we execute” -- reflects a team aligned with Trump’s vision. Contrast this with the leaks and infighting of past administrations. MAGA efficiency shines through.

Trump’s final call on Iran will come when he’s ready, not when the chattering class demands it. His critics, obsessed with woke optics, can’t fathom this level of strategic patience. America is back, and it’s playing to win.

About Alex Tanzer

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox