Trump pardons Virginia sheriff convicted in bribery case

By 
 updated on May 27, 2025

President Donald Trump just pulled a Virginia sheriff from the jaws of a federal prison sentence. Former Culpeper County Sheriff Scott Jenkins, convicted on bribery and fraud charges, received a full pardon, a move announced via Trump’s Truth Social platform, as the Associated Press reports. The move has sparked fresh debate over justice and political loyalty.

Jenkins, 53, faced a decade behind bars after a March sentencing. Trump’s pardon ensures that Jenkins won’t serve a single day. This decision underscores a broader pattern of Trump challenging what he calls a weaponized justice system.

In 2023, federal authorities indicted Jenkins on 16 counts, including conspiracy, wire fraud, and bribery tied to programs receiving federal funds. A December 2024 jury convicted him on one conspiracy count, four counts of honest services fraud, and seven bribery charges. The charges stemmed from Jenkins allegedly deputizing businessmen for cash payments.

Sheriff’s questionable deals exposed

Undercover FBI agents, sworn in as auxiliary deputies in 2022, handed Jenkins envelopes stuffed with $5,000 and $10,000 in cash. These transactions formed the backbone of the prosecution’s case. Jenkins, taking the stand, insisted there was no link between the cash and the badges he issued.

Despite his defense, the jury wasn’t convinced. Jenkins’ appeal, filed in April 2025, was pending when Trump’s pardon swept in. The timing of Trump's announcement, made on Memorial Day when the U.S. Attorney’s Office was closed, left prosecutors unable to immediately respond.

Trump called Jenkins a “wonderful person” persecuted by “Radical Left monsters.” He claimed that Jenkins was “dragged through HELL by a Corrupt and Weaponized Biden DOJ.” The pardon, Trump declared, ensures Jenkins “will NOT be going to jail tomorrow” but will lead a “productive life.”

Trump’s pardon patterns emerge

Jenkins’ case isn’t Trump’s first rodeo with pardons. In April of this year, he pardoned Nevada Republican Michele Fiore, who misused funds meant for a slain officer’s statue. Trump also freed Ross Ulbricht, Silk Road's founder, from a life sentence in January.

Trump’s clemency has also been extended to over 1,500 individuals tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol unrest. These include those convicted of assaulting police officers, a move that raised eyebrows even among conservatives. Critics argue that it’s a selective rewrite of justice on behalf of political allies.

Acting U.S. Attorney Zachary T. Lee, commenting on Jenkins’ conviction, said it proves that officials using authority for “unjust personal enrichment” will face accountability. Trump, however, dismissed the credibility of the presiding judge, Robert Ballou, claiming he “went on a tirade” and refused to let Jenkins off lightly. The pardon effectively nullifies Lee’s stance.

Justice or political favoritism?

Jenkins’ lawyers were unreachable for immediate comment, likely savoring a holiday reprieve. The pardon halts Jenkins’ prison term before it could begin. It’s a bold stroke, but one that fits Trump’s narrative of fighting what he believes is often a “corrupt” system.

The FBI’s sting operation revealed a sheriff willing to trade badges for cash. Yet Trump’s intervention suggests Jenkins was unfairly targeted. The truth, as always, may lie in the murky middle where loyalty and law collide.

Trump’s Truth Social post framed Jenkins as a victim of Biden’s DOJ. “Left for dead” by prosecutors, Jenkins now gets a second chance. Whether this is justice or favoritism depends on where you stand on the MAGA spectrum.

Pardon sparks broader debate

The pardon’s timing, on a holiday weekend, feels like a calculated jab at the feds. Jenkins, once a trusted sheriff, now walks free while the DOJ scrambles. Actions have consequences, but so does clemency.

Trump’s supporters see this as a righteous middle finger to a woke justice system. Critics, though, warn that it undermines accountability for public officials. Both sides agree: The pardon game is heating up.

Jenkins’ case, like Fiore’s and Ulbricht’s, shows Trump’s willingness to wield his pardon power broadly. With each move, he challenges the narrative of impartial justice. For now, Jenkins is free, and the debate over Trump’s pardons rages on.

About Alex Tanzer

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox