Trump declares Iran 'agreed to everything' in nuclear deal, Strait of Hormuz reopens

By 
, April 17, 2026 
Category:

President Donald Trump said Friday that Iran has "agreed to everything" the United States demanded in negotiations, including halting uranium enrichment, reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and cutting off funding to terrorist proxy groups, capping weeks of escalating military and diplomatic pressure that brought the Islamic Republic to the table.

The announcement came after a high-stakes sequence: talks in Islamabad, a U.S. naval blockade, and a final American offer that left Tehran with little room to maneuver. Trump made the remarks in a phone call with NewsNation's Kellie Meyer shortly after he declared the Strait of Hormuz open for international shipping.

When Meyer asked whether Iran had agreed to stop enriching uranium, Trump answered with a single word: "Yes." He added, "They agreed to everything." Asked if he was surprised by the outcome, the president was blunt: "I'm not surprised by anything."

From collapse to capitulation: how the deal came together

The path to Friday's announcement ran through Islamabad, where a U.S. delegation led by Vice President JD Vance, Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, and Jared Kushner sat across from Iranian negotiators last week. The talks did not go smoothly. A U.S. official told Breitbart News that the Iranian regime refused to agree on six key redlines presented by the American side.

Those redlines were not modest. They demanded that Iran allow the retrieval of highly enriched uranium, dismantle all major nuclear enrichment facilities, end all uranium enrichment, accept a broader peace and de-escalation framework involving regional allies, fully open the Strait of Hormuz with no tolls for passage, and end funding for terrorist proxies Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

Iran balked. Vance left the table with a parting message that amounted to a take-it-or-leave-it ultimatum.

"We leave here with a very simple proposal, a method of understanding that is our final and best offer. We'll see if the Iranians accept it."

The official said Vance was hopeful that the Iranians, after reflection, would find the proposal in the best interest of both parties. What followed was not reflection so much as reality. Trump had already imposed a naval blockade on Iran after the Vance-led talks collapsed, choking off the regime's economic lifeline through the Strait of Hormuz.

The blockade that forced Iran's hand

The U.S. Navy blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was the kind of move critics warned would destabilize global energy markets. But it was designed to create exactly the kind of pressure that makes a regime choose survival over defiance. And by Friday, that pressure had done its work.

Trump posted on Truth Social to make the terms public:

"THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ IS COMPLETELY OPEN AND READY FOR BUSINESS AND FULL PASSAGE, BUT THE NAVAL BLOCKADE WILL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT AS IT PERTAINS TO IRAN, ONLY, UNTIL SUCH TIME AS OUR TRANSACTION WITH IRAN IS 100% COMPLETE."

A second post followed: "THIS PROCESS SHOULD GO VERY QUICKLY IN THAT MOST OF THE POINTS ARE ALREADY NEGOTIATED. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!"

The message was clear. The Strait is open for the world. It stays closed for Iran until every term is fulfilled. That is leverage, maintained even after the handshake.

Enriched uranium headed to U.S. custody

Perhaps the most consequential element of the reported agreement is what happens to Iran's enriched uranium. Trump declared that the United States will retrieve enriched uranium from sites bombed in Operation Midnight Hammer last June. Just The News reported that the U.S. and Iran would work together to remove Iran's enriched uranium and bring it back to the United States, a step that, if carried out, would strip Tehran of the fissile material needed for a weapon.

Trump addressed the logistics in his call with Meyer. He said no additional U.S. ground troops would be needed for the retrieval.

"No troops. We'll go down and get it with them, and then we'll take it. We'll be getting it together because by that time, we'll have an agreement and there's no need for fighting when there's an agreement."

That framing, no new boots on the ground, cooperative retrieval under a signed deal, is the kind of outcome that eluded the Obama administration's 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which left Iran's enrichment infrastructure intact and its ballistic missile program untouched. If this deal holds, it goes far beyond anything Washington has previously extracted from Tehran.

Proxy funding and regional architecture

The agreement also reportedly requires Iran to end its funding of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, the three terrorist proxy networks that have destabilized the Middle East for decades, dragged the United States into repeated confrontations, and threatened American allies from Israel to Saudi Arabia. Trump also noted that Iran is removing mines it had dropped in the Strait and has agreed never again to close the waterway.

Trump thanked Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, a signal that the broader regional framework demanded in the redlines may already be taking shape. He also noted the deal is not tied to Lebanon, suggesting the administration views the Hezbollah question as separate from the bilateral nuclear arrangement.

Not everyone is ready to declare the region stable. Fox News reported that former Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren cautioned that Hezbollah tensions and regional instability remain major obstacles even as Iran makes nuclear concessions. That is a fair warning. Deals on paper do not automatically produce peace on the ground.

Congressional resistance and the road ahead

The announcement lands in a political environment where Trump's Iran policy has faced fierce opposition from Democrats and even some skepticism from within his own coalition. The House recently rejected a resolution to end Trump's Iran campaign by a single vote, a razor-thin margin that showed how close Congress came to pulling the rug out from under the administration's maximum-pressure strategy.

Had that resolution passed, the blockade that forced Iran to the table might never have been sustained long enough to produce Friday's outcome. The lawmakers who voted to maintain the president's authority can now point to a concrete result. Those who tried to end the campaign before it bore fruit will have to explain what alternative they had in mind.

There are legitimate open questions. The exact status of each of the six redlines after Trump's sweeping claim remains unclear. The administration has not released a signed document. Weekend meetings between U.S. and Iranian officials are reportedly planned to finalize terms. Verification and enforcement mechanisms, always the weak point of any deal with Tehran, have not been publicly detailed.

Trump had earlier warned Iran of a stronger military response if the regime rejected the deal, making clear that the alternative to negotiation was escalation. That credible threat of force, backed by a naval blockade already in place and the precedent of Operation Midnight Hammer, appears to have concentrated minds in Tehran.

What the deal means, if it holds

Strip away the noise and the stakes are plain. If Iran follows through, surrendering its enriched uranium, dismantling enrichment facilities, defunding its proxy armies, and keeping the Strait open, this would represent the most significant nonproliferation achievement in a generation. It would do what the JCPOA never attempted: remove the material, not just slow the clock.

The "if" matters. Iran has a long history of cheating on international commitments, hiding facilities from inspectors, and stalling until political winds shift in Washington. The naval blockade remaining in force until the deal is "100% complete" is a structural safeguard, a recognition that trust is not the currency here. Compliance is.

Trump's critics spent weeks warning that the blockade was reckless, that the confrontation would spiral, that diplomacy was dead. On Friday, the president picked up the phone and said two words: "They agreed."

The hard part is enforcement. But the harder part, getting a hostile regime to say yes under pressure, appears to be done. That is what leverage looks like when someone is willing to use it.

About Sadie Smith

From campaign chaos to late-breaking developments, Sadie covers politics with speed and clarity. She focuses on what’s happening right now, how it got there, and why readers should care. The goal is simple: useful political coverage without the lectures.

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox