President Donald Trump just scored a massive win against media giant CBS. The network and its parent, Paramount Global, settled his election interference lawsuit, coughing up a fortune and rewriting their editorial playbook, as Fox News reports. This isn’t just a payout -- it’s a reckoning for biased reporting.
Trump’s lawsuit, targeting CBS over a 2024 60 Minutes interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, ended with a settlement exceeding $30 million, including $16 million upfront for legal fees and charitable causes. An additional mid-eight-figure sum is earmarked for future CBS ads or public service announcements backing conservative causes, though Paramount’s current brass disputes this allocation. The deal dwarfs the $15 million ABC paid Trump last year to settle a defamation suit.
Trump’s legal team alleged CBS deceitfully edited Harris’ 60 Minutes interview to protect her image before a critical election period. The suit claimed correspondent Bill Whitaker’s question about Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu exposed Harris’ incoherent “word salad” response, which CBS partially aired on Face the Nation but swapped for a polished version in a primetime special. Critics slammed CBS for shielding Harris from voter backlash.
FCC-released raw transcripts and footage later confirmed that both Harris’ responses came from the same answer, with CBS splitting the messy first half and concise second half across broadcasts. CBS denied any journalistic misstep, standing by its reporting. Yet, the settlement forces CBS to adopt a “Trump Rule,” mandating unedited transcripts of future presidential candidate interviews be released promptly.
Trump’s attorneys, armed with the unedited transcript, amended their $20 billion lawsuit to bolster their case. “They cheated and defrauded the American people at levels never seen before,” Trump declared on Truth Social, blasting CBS for Harris’ edited response. His team’s spokesperson hailed the settlement as a victory for holding “Fake News media accountable.”
“The unanimous view at ‘60 Minutes’ is that there should be no settlement,” a veteran producer fumed, calling the lawsuit baseless. Sorry, but the evidence suggests otherwise -- CBS’s footage showed selective editing that flattered a struggling candidate. The producer’s defiance reeks of media arrogance, not principle.
Paramount’s controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, pushed for mediation to settle before a multi-billion-dollar merger with Skydance Media, fearing FCC retaliation could derail the deal. The lawsuit, unrelated to the merger, still posed a regulatory threat. Paramount’s statement clarified that the settlement releases all claims against CBS reporting up to the agreement.
Sen. Bernie Sanders and eight Democratic Party allies urged Redstone not to settle, labeling the lawsuit an “attack on the First Amendment.” “Presidents do not get to punish or censor the media,” they wrote. Nice try, but protecting free speech doesn’t mean excusing manipulated broadcasts that mislead voters.
FCC Chair Brendan Carr had already ordered CBS to release the unedited transcript, probing potential “news distortion” violations. The raw footage exposed CBS’s editorial sleight-of-hand, vindicating Trump’s claims. Carr’s intervention proves regulators aren’t sleeping on media bias.
CBS News President and CEO Wendy McMahon resigned in May, citing disagreements with Paramount’s direction. “It’s time for me to move on,” she told staffers, abandoning ship as the settlement loomed. Her exit signals deeper turmoil within CBS over accountability.
60 Minutes executive producer Bill Owens also stepped down in April, frustrated by his lack of independent decision-making power. Owens opposed apologizing to Trump, but the settlement sidestepped any formal regret. Tough luck—CBS’s actions spoke louder than any non-apology.
Paramount’s stockholders meeting, set for Wednesday at 9 a.m. ET, was likely to involve questions about the settlement’s cost. The deal, which avoids direct payments to Trump personally, still stings for a company navigating a high-stakes merger. Shareholders deserve answers on why CBS’s editorial missteps led to this mess.
Trump called the case a “winner” in April, and the settlement proves him right. The $16 million upfront will fund legal fees, case costs, and contributions to his future presidential library or charities, at his discretion. The additional allocation for conservative ads ensures his message will echo on CBS’s airwaves.
“A settlement would be very damaging to CBS,” 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley warned. Damaging? Try liberating—CBS’s forced transparency and hefty payout signal the media can’t hide behind “journalistic integrity” while pushing narratives.
This settlement isn’t just about money -- it’s a warning to networks that voters demand unfiltered truth. The “Trump Rule” and millions in conservative ads will reshape how CBS covers candidates. For once, the media faces real consequences for playing favorites.
Iran’s nuclear ambitions took a devastating hit, but the regime is scrambling to rebuild its battered Fordow facility. Tehran admitted the underground enrichment plant, a linchpin of its nuclear program, was severely damaged by U.S. and Israeli strikes, as the U.S. Sun reports. The mullahs’ defiance in the face of precision bombing reeks of desperation, not strength.
The 12-Day War, sparked by Israel’s Operation Rising Lion on June 13, targeted Iran’s military nuclear sites, followed by U.S. and Israeli airstrikes that obliterated Fordow’s capabilities. Iran’s nuclear program now hangs by a thread, with the U.S. dropping over a dozen 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-buster bombs and Israel disrupting access through Operation Midnight Hammer. Yet, satellite imagery reveals construction crews buzzing around Fordow’s craters, signaling Tehran’s refusal to back down.
Israel kicked off the conflict with Operation Rising Lion, a surgical strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Operation Red Wedding followed, wiping out 30 top Iranian military leaders in a near-simultaneous attack. The regime’s humiliation was complete when its daily ballistic missile salvos against Israel missed strategic targets entirely.
Iran’s missile attacks on the U.S.’s Al-Udeid Air Base were equally futile, as Tehran tipped off Qatar, allowing American personnel and aircraft to relocate safely. A ceasefire eventually halted the tit-for-tat, but not before Iran’s nuclear dreams were buried under rubble. The regime’s bluster can’t mask its military incompetence.
At Fordow, near Qom, satellite images show heavy equipment—excavators, cranes, and trucks -- swarming impact craters. A new access road links the northern tunnel entrance to a crater, suggesting frantic repair efforts. David Albright noted, “Iran may be filling the craters and conducting engineering damage assessments,” but such patchwork won’t restore Fordow’s former glory anytime soon.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) sounded alarms, warning Iran could resume uranium enrichment within months. Rafael Grossi stressed, “They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning.” Tehran’s rejection of Grossi’s site visit request only fuels suspicions of covert nuclear schemes.
Before the strikes, Iran reportedly moved 408.6 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium from sensitive sites. If refined to 90%, this stockpile could yield over nine nuclear bombs. Grossi warned, “We don’t know where this material could be,” underscoring the regime’s dangerous opacity.
Tehran’s lawmakers voted to suspend IAEA cooperation, a move that screams guilt. Grossi pleaded, “We need to be in a position to ascertain, to confirm what is there,” but Iran’s stonewalling suggests they’re hiding more than just rubble. The regime’s secrecy is a global red flag.
President Donald Trump celebrated the Fordow strike, declaring, “The whole place was just destroyed.” He boasted, “We went in, we destroyed their nuclear capability and we stopped,” framing the operation as a masterstroke. Yet, Iran’s construction frenzy hints that the fight is far from over.
Trump didn’t mince words about future threats: “I would absolutely consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed.” He added, “I would without question attack the country if U.S. intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium.” His resolve contrasts sharply with Iran’s crumbling defenses.
The U.S. deployed B-2 Spirit stealth bombers to deliver the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrators, turning Fordow into a moonscape. Trump noted, “Nothing was taken out... too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!” The precision of American firepower left Iran’s nuclear ambitions in tatters.
Iran’s response? A fatwa from Grand Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi, branding Trump and Netanyahu “enemies of God” and calling for their deaths. Such clerical tantrums only highlight Tehran’s impotence against Western might. Religious edicts won’t rebuild Fordow or deter future strikes.
Iran’s nuclear program, once a symbol of regime pride, now lies in ruins, yet the ayatollahs cling to their dangerous fantasies. The IAEA’s warnings about rapid uranium enrichment underscore the stakes: a nuclear-armed Iran threatens the world. Tehran’s defiance, coupled with its construction at Fordow, demands unwavering vigilance.
The ceasefire may have paused the bombs, but Iran’s nuclear ambitions simmer beneath the surface. The regime’s refusal to cooperate with the IAEA and its secretive uranium movements suggest a rogue state undeterred by military setbacks. Western leaders must keep the pressure on, not fall for diplomatic platitudes.
America and Israel proved their resolve, dismantling Fordow with surgical precision while Iran’s missiles flopped. Trump’s readiness to strike again should Tehran cross the enrichment line is a warning the mullahs can’t ignore. The free world must stand firm, ensuring Iran’s nuclear threat stays buried under those craters.
Donald Trump’s deal-making prowess delivered a stunning week of victories, cementing his influence on the global stage, as Breitbart reports. From brokering a Middle East ceasefire to reshaping NATO’s budget, the president’s policies are rewriting the rules. This isn’t just a comeback -- it’s a conservative juggernaut.
Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran on Monday, halting a 12-day war. The agreement, effective six hours later, saw Iran pause first, with Israel following at the 12-hour mark, officially ending hostilities after 24 hours. Both sides agreed to remain peaceful during each other’s ceasefire period, a diplomatic win that silenced progressive naysayers.
“CONGRATULATIONS TO EVERYONE!” Trump declared, touting the ceasefire’s precision. Critics who scoffed at his unorthodox style now face a Middle East no longer teetering on endless war. The deal’s success underscores his knack for cutting through diplomatic red tape.
Trump’s ceasefire didn’t just stop bombs -- it stopped the woke narrative of perpetual conflict. “This is a War that could have gone on for years,” he said, praising the agreement’s global impact. Conservatives cheer as his leadership proves stronger than the left’s endless hand-wringing.
Meanwhile, Trump turned his sights to NATO, securing a historic agreement at the Hague summit. Member states now face a 5% GDP defense spending minimum, up from the paltry 2% expectation. The new floor includes previously uncounted spending categories, a clever move to bolster alliance strength.
Trump called the NATO deal a “monumental win,” and he’s not wrong. European elites, cozy with their underfunded militaries, got a wake-up call. This summit, the first major NATO gathering in years, showcased Trump’s ability to bend allies to America’s will.
The U.S. Supreme Court handed Trump another victory on Friday, voting 6-3 to curb lower courts’ power to issue nationwide injunctions against his policies. The ruling stemmed from a challenge to his policy opposing automatic birthright citizenship for children of unauthorized migrants. While the court hasn’t ruled on the policy itself, this decision clips the wings of activist judges.
“GIANT WIN in the United States Supreme Court!” Trump exclaimed, celebrating the blow to judicial overreach. The left’s reliance on rogue courts to block conservative agendas just took a hit. Pam Bondi and John Sauer’s legal team deserves a nod for this one.
Trump’s birthright citizenship stance, though still under review, stirred the pot. “Even the Birthright Citizenship Hoax has been, indirectly, hit hard,” he said, tying it to historical context rather than modern scams. Critics clutching their pearls over this policy might want to brush up on constitutional history.
On Saturday, the Senate voted to advance Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill,” a legislative behemoth tackling immigration, border security, energy, defense, tax cuts, and more. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) helped steer the procedural win. This bill is a conservative dream, shredding progressive priorities like confetti.
The bill’s provisions, from extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts to axing taxes on tips and overtime, scream economic freedom. Leftists who fetishize government overreach must be fuming. The Senate’s vote proves Trump’s agenda still commands loyalty.
Wall Street joined the party, with U.S. stock markets hitting all-time highs on Friday. Analysts tied the surge to Trump’s string of policy wins, from NATO to the Supreme Court. Investors prefer a leader who delivers results over one peddling woke platitudes.
Trump’s week wasn’t just a political flex -- it was a masterclass in conservative governance. The ceasefire, NATO deal, court ruling, and Senate vote show a leader unafraid to challenge globalist dogma. Progressives, meanwhile, are left scrambling to spin this as anything but a rout.
His ability to juggle Middle East peace, alliance reform, judicial restraint, and legislative momentum is no accident. Trump’s critics, addicted to their sanctimonious lectures, underestimated his strategic depth. The MAGA base, however, sees this for what it is: America First in action.
As the dust settles, Trump’s vision is reshaping the world. From the Hague to the Senate floor, his policies are dismantling the left’s tired playbook. Conservatives have every reason to celebrate -- and the woke crowd, well, they’re just out of excuses.
Kristi Noem just reshaped America’s asylum policy with a bold Central American pact. On Thursday, the Department of Homeland Security secretary announced a deal with Honduras and Guatemala to accept asylum seekers aiming for the U.S. border, as Just the News reports. This move signals a no-nonsense approach to curbing unchecked migration.
The agreement, finalized during Noem’s Central America trip, allows Honduras and Guatemala to grant refugee status to migrants. It’s a strategic pivot in the Trump administration’s escalating crackdown on illegal immigration and deportations of serious criminal migrants. Progressive dreams of open borders just took a hit.
Noem’s announcement capped her diplomatic sprint through the region. Earlier this year, Secretary of State Marco Rubio inked a separate deal with Guatemala, marking it as a transit hub for migrants sent back to their origins. That agreement, unlike this new one, didn’t involve granting refugee status.
The latest deal expands Honduras and Guatemala’s roles significantly. “Honduras and now Guatemala, after today, will be countries that will take those individuals and give them refugee status as well,” Noem declared. Her words underscore a practical solution that doesn’t default to America as the sole haven.
Noem’s logic challenges the left’s narrative that the U.S. must absorb all comers. “We’ve never believed that the United States should be the only option,” she said, emphasizing safety over sentimentality. This stance exposes the folly of equating compassion with unrestricted entry.
Guatemala’s earlier agreement with Rubio set the stage for this broader policy. That deal focused on repatriation logistics, not refugee acceptance. Now, Guatemala steps up alongside Honduras to shoulder more responsibility in the migration crisis.
The Trump administration’s deportation push targets migrants who’ve committed serious crimes in the U.S. This new agreement aligns with that priority, redirecting asylum seekers before they reach American soil. It’s a proactive jab at the chaos fueled by lax border policies.
Canada already has an asylum agreement with the U.S., sharing the load of refugee processing. Mexico, however, dug in its heels, refusing a similar deal on Tuesday. Yet, Mexico has quietly accepted over 5,000 deported migrants since Trump’s return to office.
Mexico’s reluctance to formalize an asylum pact raises eyebrows. While they’ve taken in thousands, their resistance suggests a half-hearted commitment to regional cooperation. Noem’s deal with Honduras and Guatemala sidesteps Mexico’s posturing, securing allies who’ll act.
Noem’s trip wasn’t about photo-ops; it was about results. Finalizing this agreement on her last day in Central America shows a relentless focus on policy over politics. The left’s obsession with “humane” borders often ignores the havoc of unchecked migration.
The Honduras-Guatemala deal reframes the asylum debate. By empowering neighboring nations to handle refugees, the U.S. avoids being the default destination. This dismantles the progressive myth that America alone must solve the world’s crises.
Noem’s second quote drives the point home: “The guarantee for a refugee is that they go somewhere to be safe and to be protected.” She’s right -- safety doesn’t require a U.S. address. Critics who cry “heartless” miss the bigger picture of sustainable solutions.
The administration’s broader strategy is clear: deport criminals, streamline asylum, and share responsibility. Honduras and Guatemala’s willingness to step up contrasts sharply with Mexico’s waffling. It’s a diplomatic win that strengthens America’s position.
This agreement also exposes the flaws in woke immigration rhetoric. Endless compassion without structure breeds disorder, not solutions. Noem’s deal offers a balanced approach -- empathy paired with pragmatism.
By securing this pact, Noem delivers a masterclass in America First policy. It’s not about shutting doors; it’s about opening the right ones elsewhere. The left may fume, but results like these speak louder than their slogans.
Iran’s nuclear dreams just took a serious hit, and Israel, backed by the U.S., is ready to keep the pressure on. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz told a closed-door Knesset meeting that both nations are locked and loaded to strike again if Iran dares rebuild its nuclear or missile programs, as the Washington Free Beacon reports. This isn’t diplomacy’s finest hour -- both countries see talks with Tehran as a dead end.
On Monday, a U.S.-brokered ceasefire paused a 12-day clash between Israel and Iran, but Tuesday’s briefing at Tel Aviv’s Kirya military headquarters made it clear the fight is not over. Katz, addressing the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, laid out a no-nonsense plan to monitor Iran’s every move. The message? Try rebuilding and face the consequences.
“Israel and the United States are in full agreement,” said Knesset member Boaz Bismuth, hammering home the unity on stopping Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Agreement’s nice, but it’s the joint surveillance and strike-ready posture that’ll keep Tehran’s mullahs up at night. The progressive fantasy of a peaceful Iran is just that—a fantasy.
The ceasefire stopped the bombs, but Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs remain under a microscope. Sensitive sites like the Fordow enrichment facility and missile depots are being watched like hawks by Israeli and U.S. forces. If Iran’s leaders think they can sneak back to business as usual, they’re in for a rude awakening.
Katz revealed Israel’s “do-not-approach” policy, a tactic borrowed from its Hezbollah ceasefire playbook, enforced by drones and precision strikes. Israeli drones, operating from U.S. bases in Iraq and Syria, joined jets launching from Israel during the conflict. This cross-border teamwork shows the U.S. isn’t just cheering from the sidelines.
Iran has 400 kilograms of near-weapons-grade uranium, and Israel is ready to strike if anyone tries to touch it. That stockpile’s a ticking time bomb, and the “woke” crowd’s calls for diplomacy ignore the hard reality: Iran’s leaders don’t play nice. Trusting them is like handing a toddler a flamethrower.
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump, speaking at a NATO summit in the Netherlands, didn’t mince words. “Sure,” he said when asked about striking Iran again, adding, “It’s gone for years, years.” His confidence is backed by U.S. strikes that crippled Fordow and Israeli attacks that set Iran’s nuclear program back decades, according to Netanyahu’s office.
Trump’s blunt talk cuts through the diplomatic fog like a knife. The idea that Iran’s nuclear program is “gone” isn’t wishful thinking -- it’s the result of hard-hitting action. The left’s obsession with endless talks looks weaker by the day.
Iran’s 800 remaining ballistic missiles are stuck in a bombed-out zone, needing major repairs to be accessed. That’s a win for Israel and the U.S., who’ve made it clear they’re not easing up. The notion of Iran as a “victim” here is laughable -- Tehran’s aggression brought this on.
Katz hinted Israel’s next target might be Yemen’s Houthi rebels, Iran’s proxies who fired missiles and drones at Israel during the conflict. This isn’t about chasing shadows -- it’s about cutting off Iran’s regional tentacles. The Houthis’ attacks prove Tehran’s still stirring the pot, ceasefire or not.
“Those who should know are confident … that Iran can’t build a bomb right now,” Bismuth said. Great, but confidence isn’t complacency—Israel and the U.S. are still watching every move. The woke narrative of “de-escalation” ignores Iran’s history of proxy wars and terror.
The strikes have shaken Iran’s leadership, possibly fueling internal unrest, though Israel isn’t pushing for regime change. “The Iranian people deserve a better life,” Bismuth noted, pointing to the regime’s failures. It’s a polite way of saying Tehran’s tyrants are on thin ice, and their people might finish the job.
The U.S. plans to meet Iranian officials next week, but don’t hold your breath for a breakthrough. “If we can have an agreement … then we’re in favor. Are we expecting that? No,” Bismuth said, summing up the skepticism. Diplomacy with a regime that dreams of nuclear dominance is like negotiating with a scorpion.
Israel’s strikes, paired with U.S. muscle, have made one thing clear: Iran’s nuclear ambitions are on life support. The ceasefire might’ve paused the fighting, but the real battle -- keeping Iran in check -- is far from over. The West’s naive hope for a reformed Iran is science fiction, not strategy.
“A nuclear Iran should be … in the domain of science fiction,” Bismuth declared. That’s the goal, and Israel and the U.S. are making it reality with vigilance and firepower. The woke world might clutch its pearls, but strength, not handholding, is what keeps rogue regimes at bay.
