Former President Joe Biden’s stubborn refusal to exit the 2024 presidential race crushed Kamala Harris’ chances, a top campaign adviser has just claimed.
David Plouffe, a senior Harris campaign aide and former Obama White House insider, pointed the finger at Biden for the vice president’s defeat in a scathing new book, and the revelations expose a Democratic Party in disarray, clinging to a faltering leader while ignoring the will of working-class Americans, as the New York Post reports.
Plouffe, in the forthcoming book Original Sin by Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper, blames Biden’s delayed withdrawal for Harris’ loss against Donald Trump after a grueling 107-day campaign. The adviser’s blunt assessment lays bare the chaos within the Democratic Party elite, who prioritized loyalty to Biden over the nation’s needs.
Concerns about Biden’s fitness emerged sharply after his shaky debate performance on June 27, 2024. Plouffe privately questioned the president’s mental and physical stamina, yet Biden’s inner circle insisted he could secure another term. This denial, Plouffe argues, set Harris up for failure.
Despite Plouffe’s warnings, Biden’s team dismissed concerns about his stumbles, gaffes, and apparent confusion. The White House publicly maintained that Biden was in robust health, a claim that rang hollow to many. Plouffe later called the situation “a f–king nightmare” for Harris’ campaign.
Biden finally stepped aside on July 21, 2024, three weeks after the debate debacle. His exit came too late, leaving Harris with scant time to rally voters against Trump’s populist surge. Plouffe minced no words, declaring Biden “totally f–ked us” by clinging to the race.
The fallout was brutal, with Democratic Party insiders slamming Plouffe and fellow Obama alum Stephanie Cutter for misreading voter priorities. Critics argued the duo was swayed by cable news and social media echo chambers, disconnected from the heartland’s concerns. One source close to the campaign sneered, “They tried an Obama play with a non-Obama candidate.”
Plouffe and Cutter’s focus on elite-driven issues alienated working-class voters, insiders claimed. “Cable news and Twitter are not real life,” one source said, blasting their messaging as out of touch. This miscalculation deepened the hole from which Harris struggled to emerge.
Two days after Harris’ defeat, Plouffe briefly deleted his X account following a post admitting the campaign “dug out of a deep hole but not enough.” The move sparked speculation of internal panic as Democrats grappled with the loss. Plouffe’s frustration underscored the campaign’s uphill battle, rooted in Biden’s delayed departure.
Democratic Party critics didn’t spare Biden’s inner circle, accusing his family and aides of enabling a doomed candidacy. One senior aide lamented, “It was a disservice to the country and to the party” for Biden to run again. The aide praised Biden’s decency but decried the decision as reckless.
A prominent Democratic Party strategist went further, calling Biden’s persistence “an abomination” that robbed the party and the nation of a fair shot. The strategist accused Biden of effectively stealing the election from Democrats by refusing to step down sooner. These harsh words reflect a party fractured by hubris and misjudgment.
Biden’s defenders, however, pushed back against the criticism. A Biden spokesperson insisted that “evidence of aging is not evidence of mental incapacity.” They argued that Biden remained effective, challenging critics to pinpoint any presidential failure tied to mental decline. The spokesperson doubled down, claiming Biden’s record proved his competence. “He was a very effective president,” they said, dismissing allegations of mental or physical shortcomings. Yet, these defenses did little to quell the growing discontent within Democratic ranks.
The liberal media has also faced backlash for downplaying Biden’s visible struggles, from physical stumbles to moments of confusion. Critics argued this cover-up shielded Biden but doomed Harris, leaving her to inherit a sinking ship. The media’s role in propping up Biden fueled distrust among voters weary of elitist narratives.
Plouffe’s blunt assessment in Original Sin paints a damning picture of a Democratic Party unmoored from reality. “And it’s all Biden,” he declared, pinning Harris’ loss on the president’s refusal to bow out gracefully. The fallout exposes a party beholden to progressive dogma, ignoring the values of faith, family, and hard work that resonate with everyday Americans.
As Democrats lick their wounds, the Harris campaign’s collapse serves as a warning against elitism and denial. Biden’s legacy, once celebrated, now carries the stain of a strategic blunder that handed Trump the advantage. For a nation craving strength and sovereignty, the Democrats’ missteps prove they’ve lost touch with the heartland.
Louis Prevost’s unfiltered social media rants have thrust the brother of America’s first pope into a political firestorm.
As the older sibling of newly elected Pope Leo XIV, Louis’s pro-Trump posts clash with his brother’s liberal leanings, and the controversy exposes a deep family divide that’s gripping the attention of millions, as the Daily Mail reports.
Pope Leo XIV, born Robert Prevost, was elected on Thursday, marking a historic moment for American Catholics. Louis, a Port Charlotte and Tampa, Florida, resident, has used his Facebook page to champion Donald Trump. His posts, filled with MAGA memes, contrast sharply with the new pope’s views.
In April, Louis reposted a video of Rep. Nancy Pelosi from 1996, accompanied by a caption slamming her as a drunk and using a vile slur. The post also mocked liberals, reflecting Louis’s disdain for progressive politics. Such rhetoric has sparked outrage among those expecting restraint from the pope’s family.
In October 2024, Louis shared a meme depicting an asylum, captioned as a jab at “woke” culture before the 1970s. Earlier that year, he reposted a message ridiculing supporters of Joe Biden, urging prayers for their “mental affliction.” These actions highlight his alignment with hardline conservative sentiments.
On Aug. 30, Louis claimed 20 illegal immigrants tried to hijack a bus of children in Southern California. He described the incident as part of a “war for our streets,” blaming the current administration for unchecked border policies. His post suggested such events could fuel child trafficking, amplifying fears among his followers.
Pope Leo XIV, in contrast, has retweeted critiques of the Trump administration, including an op-ed targeting Vice President JD Vance’s faith-based politics. The pope has also spoken on gun control, migration, and George Floyd’s death, earning him labels like “Marxist” from some MAGA supporters. This ideological rift between brothers fuels public fascination.
Louis and his brother John, the pope’s other sibling, grew up teasing Robert about becoming pope. Raised in Illinois, the brothers never imagined their childhood jests would become reality. Their late parents, John said, would have been proud yet worried about Robert’s new role.
Louis described the moment he saw Robert emerge as Pope Leo XIV as “shock and awe.” He was stunned, watching his brother step onto the Vatican balcony. The emotional weight of the event hit him hard, blending pride with disbelief. Ahead of the conclave, Louis spoke with Robert about the possibility of his election. Robert, ever faithful, said he would accept the role if chosen, seeing it as God’s will. Louis recalled the conversation as a moment of solemn clarity for his brother.
Louis expressed confidence that Robert will lead as a “man of the people.” He believes his brother’s humility and faith will guide the Catholic Church through turbulent times. Yet, Louis fears their frequent phone calls may dwindle due to Robert’s new responsibilities.
John Prevost echoed Louis’s pride but voiced concern about the challenges Robert faces. He noted the church’s internal divisions and declining membership as daunting tasks for the new pope. Bringing Catholics together, John said, will test his brother’s resolve.
Louis’s outspoken posts have drawn sharp criticism, especially given his brother’s global platform. Some prominent MAGA supporters, including Steve Bannon, have called Pope Leo XIV the “worst pick” for conservative Catholics. Bannon dubbed him the “anti-Trump pope,” escalating the political tension.
The contrast between Louis’s fiery rhetoric and the pope’s progressive stance has captivated onlookers. MAGA supporters have hurled insults at Pope Leo XIV, branding him a “liberal piece” unfit for leadership. The backlash underscores the broader cultural divide gripping America.
Louis remains unapologetic, using his platform to rail against what he sees as progressive overreach. His posts resonate with those who feel alienated by elitist institutions and open-border policies. Yet, they risk overshadowing his brother’s historic papacy with controversy.
As Pope Leo XIV begins his tenure, Louis’s social media activity continues to stir debate. The brothers’ differing worldviews reflect a nation wrestling with its identity and values. For now, Louis quips that he’s “the pope’s brother,” but getting an audience with Robert may prove harder than ever.
