Newly released memos reveal coordination between Biden DOJ, Fani Willis, and Jan. 6 committee to prosecute Trump

By 
, February 27, 2026 
Category:

Newly released memos from the Fulton County District Attorney's office show what many suspected all along: the criminal cases against Donald Trump were not independent, locally driven prosecutions. They were a coordinated effort spanning the Biden White House, the Biden Justice Department, and the Democratic-led House Jan. 6 Select Committee.

The records, obtained by Just the News through a Georgia open records lawsuit filed alongside America First Legal, reveal direct communications between Fani Willis's team and some of the most powerful political actors in Washington. Willis fought to keep these documents hidden, claiming legal privilege. Then, facing litigation, her office dropped all privilege claims and released everything without redactions.

That reversal alone tells you something.

The Paper Trail

The timeline starts taking shape in the spring of 2022. On April 20, 2022, Tim Heaphy, the Jan. 6 committee's chief investigative counsel, called Fulton County Deputy District Attorney Michael Hill. At least one Democratic office had connected the two. Heaphy followed up with an email memorializing their conversation and making an offer that should raise every eyebrow in Washington:

As we discussed yesterday, we're willing to provide an oral summary of what certain witnesses have told the committee in interviews and depositions.

He didn't stop there. Heaphy also told Hill the committee was prepared to give Willis's team access to committee documents "in camera in our office." A congressional committee investigating January 6 was actively funneling its work product to a local prosecutor building a case against the same political target.

That query, according to the records, went directly to the committee's chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

Then there's the billing. Willis's special prosecutor Nathan Wade, who later admitted to a personal relationship with Willis outside the office, billed Fulton County $2,000 for an "interview with DC/White House" on Nov. 18, 2022. The records also contain a letter from the Biden White House counsel's office waiving Trump's ability to claim executive privilege and blocking former administration officials from testifying freely.

Layer by layer, the picture becomes unmistakable. This wasn't parallel work. It was pipeline work.

Lawmakers Respond

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., posted to X on Thursday, connecting the dots bluntly:

I have said for years that Biden's White House and Justice Department had their fingerprints all over local prosecutions of Donald Trump, which were designed to stop his political comeback.

Graham laid out the broader sequence. Within days of Trump announcing his 2024 presidential campaign, Jack Smith was appointed as Special Counsel. Within months, over 90 felony charges were brought against Trump in New York by Alvin Bragg, in Georgia by Fani Willis, and in D.C. by Jack Smith. Graham argued that the flood of charges from some of the most liberal jurisdictions in America was not coincidental.

He pointed to one more detail buried in the records: Willis's office may have benefited from what Graham called "shady grants coming from Biden's DOJ," referencing an invitation for Willis to apply for a lucrative sole-source grant.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., offered a wider lens in remarks to Just the News:

When you go back, and you look at this from a 35,000-foot level, they were so desperate to pin this on Republicans, and specifically Donald Trump. Because, if you go back, you look at the Select Committee on January 6, their goal was to make sure Donald Trump never held political office again, and if they could have put him in jail, they would have.

Loudermilk emphasized that the coordination extended well beyond the select committee. Willis, he said, was willing to do "whatever" it took, including coordinating with Congress and benefiting from a White House that broke with longstanding executive privilege precedent to feed the prosecution machine.

No Crime, No Predicate

Mike Davis, a former Senate lawyer and president of the Article III Project, cut to the legal core of the problem. Speaking to Just the News and the John Solomon Reports podcast, Davis was direct:

There was no legal predicate for what they were doing. There was no crime. There was no possible crime. It is not a crime to object to a presidential election.

That framing matters. The entire apparatus of federal power, a congressional committee, the Justice Department, the White House counsel's office, and a county prosecutor in Georgia all moved in concert against one man. And according to Davis, the foundational legal justification for all of it was nonexistent.

This was not law enforcement. It was political engineering, dressed in legal clothing and distributed across jurisdictions to create the appearance of independent, organic prosecutions.

What the Records Actually Show

Consider what is now documented:

  • The Jan. 6 committee's chief counsel proactively offered Willis's team witness summaries and access to committee documents.
  • That outreach was routed through the committee chairman.
  • Willis's special prosecutor billed taxpayers for an "interview with DC/White House."
  • The Biden White House counsel waived executive privilege protections that had governed presidential communications for generations.
  • Willis fought to keep all of this secret under privilege claims she ultimately abandoned entirely.

Each of these facts standing alone might be explained away. Together, they form a pattern that no amount of procedural language can obscure.

The Privilege That Wasn't

Willis's decision to first assert privilege over these records and then drop every claim without a single redaction deserves its own scrutiny. Privilege exists to protect a legitimately confidential legal strategy. You don't abandon it wholesale unless the records were never actually privileged, or unless continuing to fight their release would expose something worse than releasing them.

Either way, the initial suppression attempt tells you Willis understood how these documents would read in public. She was right.

A Machine, Not a Coincidence

The left spent years insisting that each prosecution of Trump was independent. Alvin Bragg in Manhattan. Fani Willis in Fulton County. Jack Smith in Washington. All separate. All driven by the facts. All coincidentally arriving within months of each other, all targeting the same man, all timed to his presidential campaign.

These memos shatter that narrative. Congressional investigators were sharing evidence with local prosecutors. The White House was removing legal barriers that had protected presidential communications for centuries. A special prosecutor was billing for meetings at the White House. And the DA at the center of it all tried to bury the paper trail.

As Loudermilk put it, what we are seeing now is that this effort "was broader than just the Select Committee." The committee was one node in a network. The Biden DOJ was another. The White House was another. And Fani Willis was the local face of a national operation.

Joe Biden was described by lawmakers and legal experts as being at the center of trying to bog down his chief Republican rival. The memos don't refute that. They confirm it, one billing entry, one waived privilege, one shared document at a time.

Willis's failed criminal case didn't collapse because of bad luck. It collapsed because it was built on coordination instead of evidence.

About Alex Tanzer

Alex writes about politics, power, and the people making decisions everyone else has to live with. His work centers on accountability, media narratives, and policy fallout—without the jargon or spin. With a clean, direct style, Alex aims to make political news readable, useful, and occasionally entertaining.

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox