President Donald Trump just scored a legal victory as the Florida Supreme Court greenlit his defamation lawsuit against the Pulitzer Prize Board, as Just the News reports. The case, rooted in the board’s 2018 awards to the New York Times and the Washington Post for their coverage of Russia collusion, is moving forward without delay. This ruling slaps down the woke elite’s attempt to shield their narrative from scrutiny.
The Florida Supreme Court declined to postpone Trump’s lawsuit, rejecting the Pulitzer board’s plea to wait until he leaves office. The case was filed in Florida, where both Trump and a board member reside, giving the state court jurisdiction. This decision keeps the legal battle on track, undeterred by progressive stalling tactics.
In 2018, the Pulitzer Prize Board awarded the New York Times and the Washington Post for their reporting on the now-debunked Russia collusion narrative. Trump’s lawsuit argues this coverage was defamatory, targeting the board for honoring what he calls a hoax. The board’s decision to reward such reporting is a glaring example of media bias run amok.
The Pulitzer board’s attorneys argued that pausing the case until Trump’s term ends would avoid constitutional conflicts. They claimed a state court exercising authority over a sitting president could raise legal issues. Nice try, but the Florida courts saw through this dodge to protect the establishment’s darlings.
A state trial judge first dismissed the board’s delay request, refusing to let them hide behind procedural excuses. The Florida Fourth District Court of Appeals upheld that ruling, keeping the case moving forward. The judiciary’s refusal to bend to the board’s whining is a refreshing stand for accountability.
The Florida Supreme Court then sealed the deal, declining to take up the board’s petition for review. “This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court on jurisdictional briefs,” the court stated, “should decline to accept jurisdiction.” This no-nonsense ruling cuts through the board’s attempt to stall justice.
The court didn’t stop there, adding that “no motion for rehearing will be entertained.” This blunt dismissal shuts down any hope the Pulitzer board had of dragging things out further. It’s a clear signal that Florida’s courts won’t coddle those who peddle discredited narratives.
Trump’s legal team is likely celebrating this win, as the lawsuit can now proceed without unnecessary delays. The case’s Florida roots, tied to Trump’s and a board member’s residency, make it a fitting battleground. The state’s courts are proving they won’t bow to pressure from the liberal media machine.
The Pulitzer board’s 2018 awards to the New York Times and the Washington Post remain a sore point for conservatives. Honoring reporting on the Russia collusion story, widely criticized as a fabrication, reeks of agenda-driven journalism. Trump’s lawsuit aims to hold the board accountable for propping up this flawed narrative.
The board’s lawyers tried to frame their delay request as a constitutional safeguard, but it’s hard to see it as anything but a stall tactic. Their argument about state courts overreaching smells like a convenient excuse to avoid facing the music. The courts’ rejection of this ploy is a win for those tired of elite gatekeeping.
By allowing the lawsuit to move forward, Florida’s judiciary is sending a message: no one is above accountability, not even the Pulitzer board. The case could expose how awards are used to prop up narratives that don’t hold up under scrutiny. It’s a chance to challenge the cozy relationship between legacy media and their enablers.
Trump’s defamation claim hinges on the idea that the Pulitzer board’s awards lent undue credibility to false reporting. The Russia collusion story, once a darling of the progressive press, has crumbled under examination. This lawsuit could shine a light on how such stories are weaponized to mislead the public.
The Florida Supreme Court’s decision is a blow to those who think they can hide behind prestige and delay tactics. By refusing to entertain the board’s rehearing motion, the court is keeping the focus on the case’s merits. It’s a refreshing reminder that justice doesn’t wait for the politically connected.
This lawsuit is more than a legal skirmish; it’s a battle against a media ecosystem that often prioritizes narrative over truth. The Pulitzer board’s 2018 awards are a case study in how the elite reward their own, even when the facts don’t add up. Trump’s fight is a stand for those fed up with such distortions.
As the case moves forward, expect the left-leaning media to cry foul, painting themselves as victims of an overzealous president. But the Florida courts have spoken, and Trump’s right to challenge the Pulitzer board’s actions is intact. This is one more step toward dismantling the woke stranglehold on public discourse.
