Dr. Phil slams Ilhan Omar’s anti-American rhetoric

By 
 updated on July 2, 2025

Dr. Phil didn’t mince words when he tore into Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) for her scathing remarks about the United States. Her recent claim that America is among the “worst countries” sparked a firestorm, and conservatives are rallying behind the TV personality's sharp rebuke, as the New York Post reports. This clash exposes a deeper divide over gratitude and national pride.

Omar, who fled Somalia’s chaos as a refugee, labeled the U.S. a crumbling democracy in a June interview with Democracy Now!. Dr. Phil, a staunch defender of American opportunity, called her comments “disgusting” while conceding her right to speak. The tension underscores a growing frustration with progressive critiques of the nation’s core values.

Born in Somalia, Omar referenced her childhood under a dictatorship to critique America’s trajectory. She pointed to President Donald Trump’s June 14 military parade, which celebrated the U.S. Army’s 250th anniversary, as evidence of authoritarian overreach. Her words, equating a patriotic display to dictatorial pomp, ignited fierce backlash.

Omar’s history of controversy

“Our president is spending millions propping himself up like a failed dictator,” Omar declared, slamming the parade that coincided with Trump’s 79th birthday. Such rhetoric, conservatives argue, distorts a routine military tribute into a personal attack on national pride. Dr. Phil’s response was blunt: her disdain for America is ungrateful.

In 2019, Omar stirred outrage by proclaiming the U.S. would no longer be a “country of White people.” This remark, Dr. Phil noted, fueled perceptions of her rejecting America’s heritage. Critics see it as part of a pattern of divisive rhetoric from the congresswoman.

By 2020, Omar escalated her critique, calling for the dismantling of the “entire system of oppression” in America. Dr. Phil highlighted the irony: this “oppressive” nation welcomed her as a refugee, provided entitlements, and elevated her to Congress. Her rise, he argued, proves America’s unique openness.

Comparing America to terrorist groups

In June 2021, Omar shocked many by comparing the U.S. and Israel to Hamas and the Taliban, citing “unthinkable atrocities” by all. “That’s crazy talk,” Dr. Phil retorted, emphasizing the moral absurdity of equating America with terrorist groups. Conservatives view this as a betrayal of the nation that gave her refuge.

Omar’s defenders argue she’s highlighting America’s flaws to push for reform. Yet her critics, including Dr. Phil, see relentless ingratitude from someone who escaped Somalia’s horrors—famine, tribal violence, and a life expectancy 30 years below the global average. Her rhetoric, they say, ignores the stark contrast between the two nations.

“If this is such a horrible country, wonder why she doesn’t return to Somalia,” Dr. Phil quipped, pointing to Somalia’s dire realities. There, 99.2% of women face female genital mutilation, and child soldiers are abducted by warlords. America, by contrast, offered Omar a path to prominence.

Somalia’s grim realities

Somalia grapples with adult literacy below 40%, persecution of religious minorities, and execution of LGBTQ individuals. Dr. Phil underscored these brutal conditions to highlight Omar’s privileged position in America. Her criticism, he argued, dismisses the opportunities she’s been afforded.

“Most shocking, instead of gratitude for America, she has the unmitigated gall to just spew nothing but unwavering disdain,” Dr. Phil said. Conservatives nod in agreement, frustrated by Omar’s refusal to acknowledge America’s role in her success. Her narrative, they argue, fuels anti-American sentiment.

Omar’s defenders might claim she’s exercising free speech to critique policy. But Dr. Phil countered, “She has the right to say it, just like I have the right to say, ‘It’s absolutely disgusting.’” His words resonate with those who see her comments as a slap in the face to American values.

Call for accountability

Dr. Phil’s critique didn’t stop at Omar -- he called out her voters. “Whoever voted for her now knows who they voted for and should kick her a– to the curb,” he said. This blunt appeal urges Minnesotans to reconsider supporting a figure who, in his view, disrespects the nation.

Omar’s journey from refugee to congresswoman is a testament to America’s opportunities, yet her rhetoric often paints the nation as irredeemable. Conservatives argue this contradiction undermines her credibility. Dr. Phil’s remarks amplify a broader demand for gratitude from elected officials.

The feud between Dr. Phil and Omar highlights a cultural battle over America’s identity. While Omar frames her critiques as calls for justice, conservatives like Dr. Phil see them as divisive and ungrateful. This clash will likely fuel debates over patriotism and free speech for years to come.

About Alex Tanzer

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox