Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican gubernatorial candidate, has thrown a verbal haymaker at California Gov. Gavin Newsom, accusing him of fanning the flames of Los Angeles’ recent unrest, as the New York Post reports.
Over the weekend, Los Angeles, the nation’s second-largest city, erupted in chaos, with Bianco asserting that the riots were not about protesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) but rather a calculated attempt to disrupt through political violence.
Bianco told Fox News, “They are trying to violently influence something by political action.” His words cut through the progressive haze, exposing the riots as an assault on the rule of law, not a cry for justice. The sheriff’s clarity stands in stark contrast to the muddled narratives peddled by coastal elites.
“That is everything that the Constitution stands against,” Bianco continued, doubling down on his defense of civilized society. He warned that such lawlessness threatens the social compact, a point progressives seem eager to ignore while chasing applause on social media. The sheriff’s stance is a refreshing antidote to the left’s obsession with excusing chaos.
Bianco didn’t stop there, urging Newsom to “put his phone down” and stop fueling the unrest. His blunt directive paints Newsom as a distracted leader, more interested in crafting tweets than restoring order. It’s a stinging rebuke of a governor who appears allergic to accountability.
The sheriff further slammed Newsom, saying he “knows nothing about the enforcement of law.” Bianco’s accusation that Newsom despises law enforcement and encourages disorder is a bold challenge to the governor’s progressive posturing. The critique lands like a well-aimed dart, exposing the gap between Newsom’s rhetoric and reality.
President Donald Trump, never one to stay silent, piled on, blaming Newsom for failing to quell the violence in Los Angeles. His administration’s response was swift, deploying hundreds of Marines and National Guard troops to the city. The move underscores Trump’s no-nonsense approach, contrasting sharply with Newsom’s apparent indecision.
Newsom, predictably, responded by suing the Trump administration over the deployment. It’s a classic play from the progressive playbook: when in doubt, litigate. This legal tantrum does little to address the burning streets of Los Angeles, leaving many to question Newsom’s priorities.
Trump escalated the rhetoric on Monday, suggesting Newsom should be put in handcuffs after three nights of unrest. While provocative, the comment reflects the frustration of many who see Newsom’s leadership as a liability. It’s a bold jab, though one unlikely to materialize into actual cuffs.
White House “border czar” Tom Homan, speaking to CBS News on Monday, clarified, “There’s no intention to arrest” Newsom. Homan’s statement dials back Trump’s fiery rhetoric, but the damage to Newsom’s image is done. The governor’s handling of the crisis has left him vulnerable to such public spankings.
Trump, undeterred, mused that Newsom “likes the publicity” but called the idea of handcuffing him “a great thing.” It’s a classic Trumpian zinger, dripping with sarcasm and aimed at Newsom’s penchant for the spotlight. The president’s words keep the pressure on a governor already struggling to defend his record.
The Los Angeles riots, in their third night by Monday, have exposed deep fissures in California’s leadership. Bianco’s assertion that the rioters are not targeting ICE but engaging in political violence challenges the progressive narrative that all unrest is righteous. His words demand a reckoning with the consequences of unchecked disorder.
Newsom’s decision to sue rather than support federal intervention reeks of political theater. While Los Angeles burns, the governor’s focus on courtroom battles suggests a leader more concerned with optics than outcomes. It’s a move that plays well in progressive circles but leaves law-abiding citizens shaking their heads.
Bianco’s call for Newsom to “stay out of the way of law enforcement” is a plea for competence over ideology. The sheriff’s frustration is palpable, reflecting the sentiments of many who see Newsom’s policies as a green light for chaos. It’s a warning shot to a governor who seems out of his depth.
As California grapples with this crisis, Bianco’s candidacy for governor offers a stark alternative to Newsom’s approach. His unapologetic defense of law and order, coupled with his sharp criticism of the governor, positions him as a voice for those fed up with progressive excuses. The sheriff’s words may just echo into the next election, when voters will decide who truly stands for a civilized society.
