Hillary Clinton, long a thorn in Donald Trump’s side, has just tipped her hat to the former president for pulling off a historic peace deal in Gaza, as the Daily Mail reports.
This jaw-dropping moment of bipartisan goodwill centers on Trump’s brokering of a 20-point agreement between Israel and Hamas, potentially halting two years of brutal conflict with a staged Israeli withdrawal, hostage releases, Hamas disarmament, and transitional governance plans.
Let’s rewind to the backdrop of this saga: a devastating war in Gaza that’s raged for two years, leaving destruction in its wake and straining Israel’s global image. Clinton, a career advocate for a two-state solution, has watched past administrations -- including her own tenure under Barack Obama -- falter in similar efforts.
Clinton, the 2016 Democratic Party standard-bearer, publicly lauded Trump’s administration for securing this landmark ceasefire, a move that’s stunned observers given their bitter history. Her statement isn’t just a pat on the back; it’s a tectonic shift in tone from a woman who’s sparred with Trump at every turn.
She didn’t stop at compliments, though -- Clinton pointed to a critical moment after Israel’s controversial strike on Hamas leaders in Qatar, which she called a strategic misstep. That ill-advised move, per Clinton, opened a door for Trump’s team to rally regional players like Qatar and press Israel to end the fight. There’s a subtle jab here: sometimes, mistakes pave the way for unlikely heroes.
Clinton’s take? Trump’s negotiators seized the moment, applying decisive pressure on Israel to halt its campaign and bring both sides to the table. That’s a win even skeptics can’t ignore, though she warns the road demands patience and grit.
The nuts and bolts of this deal are staggering: a phased Israeli troop pullout from Gaza, the release of remaining hostages by Hamas, and a full disarmament of the militant group. In return, Israel will free around 2,000 Palestinian detainees, while an international body -- not tied to Hamas or the Palestinian Authority -- will oversee Gaza’s transition. It’s a delicate balance, aspiring to an independent Palestinian state without a firm timeline, which already has diplomats grumbling.
On Monday, the first steps unfolded with Israelis welcoming home the last living hostages and mourning the return of the fallen, while Palestinians anticipated the release of hundreds of prisoners. Trump, not one to miss a spotlight, was in the region alongside other leaders to hash out postwar plans. His lightning visit to Israel and Egypt underscores the high stakes of this fragile truce.
Speaking to reporters on Air Force One, Trump exuded confidence. “I think it's going to hold. I think people are tired of it,” he said of the centuries-long tensions. Call it bravado or conviction, but dismissing deep-rooted conflict as mere exhaustion might oversimplify a powder keg.
Clinton isn’t alone in giving credit where it’s due -- prominent Democrats such as Kamala Harris and Antony Blinken have chimed in with measured applause. Harris praised the collaborative efforts of Qatar, Egypt, and Trump, while Blinken thanked Trump’s envoys for reigniting hope for lasting peace. Even Obama, though sidestepping Trump’s name, acknowledged the overdue progress on social media.
Clinton herself doubled down on the broader mission. “The work of rebuilding Gaza will be arduous, laborious, and intensive,” she told CBS News. Her call for global commitment to Middle East peace is noble, but one wonders if the international community can match Trump’s deal-making pace.
Beyond the ceasefire, Clinton urged Israel to halt West Bank settlement expansion -- a long-standing sticking point -- and pressed for collective action to rebuild Gaza’s shattered landscape. Her cautious optimism tempers the celebration; she knows a signed paper isn’t a guarantee.
Trump, addressing Israel’s parliament in Jerusalem and meeting hostage families, framed this as the first phase of a comprehensive plan to end the war. His assertion that “the war is over” might be premature, but it signals a determination to close this bloody chapter. For a region weary of strife, that audacity is a breath of fresh air, even if skepticism lingers.
Let’s not kid ourselves -- rebuilding Gaza and ensuring this ceasefire sticks will be a herculean task, as Clinton rightly noted. Yet, Trump’s ability to wrangle such a deal, earning nods from across the aisle, cuts against the progressive narrative that paints him as a diplomatic wrecking ball. Maybe, just maybe, results matter more than rhetoric.
So, while the left might squirm at praising a MAGA icon, this Gaza accord stands as a rare unifier in a polarized world. Credit to Trump for navigating this minefield, and to Clinton for setting aside old grudges to recognize a job well done. If this holds, it’s a win for peace over posturing -- and that’s something even the most hardened partisan can cheer.
