Tulsi Gabbard just dropped a bombshell, gutting a Biden-era office accused of silencing conservative voices. As Director of National Intelligence, she has taken a sledgehammer to the Foreign Malign Influence Center, claiming it’s been weaponizing “disinformation” labels to censor free speech, as Just the News reports. This move signals a bold push to rein in bureaucratic overreach.
On Wednesday, Gabbard announced the center’s elimination as part of a sweeping reorganization of the U.S. intelligence community. The office, established under Biden, was meant to combat foreign interference but allegedly turned its sights on domestic dissent. Gabbard’s not playing games -- she’s calling it out as a direct attack on constitutional rights.
“This was created under the Biden administration, and ultimately it has been used … to censor Americans’ free speech,” Gabbard said. That’s a polite way of saying the center was a progressive pet project, targeting conservatives under the guise of national security. The hypocrisy is rich -- protecting democracy by stifling it?
Gabbard’s accusation is pointed: the center colluded with social media giants to flag and bury conservative content. She claims it labeled criticism of Biden’s policies as “disinformation” to justify censorship. This isn’t foreign interference -- it’s domestic meddling dressed up as patriotism.
“This center was going and working with different social media companies saying, ‘Well, this is disinformation,’” Gabbard noted. The result? Conservative voices were throttled, while the left’s narrative sailed unscathed. It’s a classic case of power protecting power, and Gabbard’s had enough.
The Foreign Malign Influence Center’s demise isn’t a standalone act -- it’s part of Gabbard’s broader plan to streamline the intelligence community. Her office, once a lean oversight body, ballooned to nearly 2,000 employees. Bloat like that breeds inefficiency and, apparently, censorship.
Gabbard’s reorganization doesn’t just target censorship -- it’s a fiscal gut-punch to wasteful spending. She’s slashing hundreds of positions, projecting savings of over $700 million annually. That’s taxpayer money no longer fueling bureaucratic empires.
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence was born from the ashes of 9/11’s intelligence failures. Its mission was oversight, not overreach, yet it grew into a sprawling machine. Gabbard’s cuts aim to refocus it on national security, not political games.
“So that’s one example of [them] not conducting our core national security mission,” Gabbard said. She’s right -- when an agency meant to protect Americans starts policing their speech, it’s lost the plot. This is what happens when woke priorities infiltrate serious institutions.
Gabbard’s move is a direct rebuke of the left’s obsession with controlling narratives. The center’s collaboration with tech companies wasn’t about truth -- it was about power. Labeling dissent as “misinformation” is a tired tactic to silence opposition.
The intelligence community should be hunting threats, not playing word police. Gabbard’s overhaul redirects resources to actual national security, not progressive crusades. It’s a refreshing return to first principles—government serves, not suppresses.
The 9/11 attacks exposed catastrophic gaps in intelligence coordination, birthing Gabbard’s agency. Its growth since then has been less about mission and more about empire-building. Gabbard’s pruning the fat, and the censorship office was the first to go.
“This is a direct contradiction and undermining of our fundamental constitutional rights,” Gabbard declared. She’s not wrong -- free speech isn’t negotiable, no matter how noble the excuse. The center’s actions were a betrayal of the very freedoms it claimed to protect.
Gabbard’s cuts signal a broader fight against woke overreach in government. By axing the center and hundreds of jobs, she’s dismantling a system that prioritized ideology over duty. Taxpayers and truth-tellers alike should be cheering.
This reorganization isn’t just about saving money -- it’s about restoring trust. When intelligence agencies play favorites with free speech, they erode their legitimacy. Gabbard’s bold move is a step toward a government that respects Americans, not one that lectures them.
