The FBI, under new Director Kash Patel, has kicked off a bombshell "grand conspiracy" investigation targeting alleged Democratic and deep-state schemes to tilt U.S. elections. This probe, launched weeks ago, digs into claims of coordinated efforts to sway voters and undermine Donald Trump, as Just the News reports. It’s a bold move that’s got the establishment squirming.
The investigation spans from the 2016 Russia collusion narrative to former special counsel Jack Smith’s actions, aiming to uncover whether these were orchestrated to favor Democrats. Two classified evidence troves, one from an inspector general’s probe into Hillary Clinton’s email server and another from John Durham’s report, could fuel the case if Trump declassifies them. These documents, sealed for nearly a decade, reportedly show the FBI ignored credible wrongdoing.
Congressional Republicans point to a laundry list of suspicious events, starting with the FBI’s 2016 decision to clear Clinton of email server charges. The classified annex, sought by Sen. Chuck Grassley, allegedly reveals the FBI had evidence in May 2016 demanding further scrutiny but let it slide. This smells like a cover-up dressed in bureaucratic red tape.
Durham’s report drops another bombshell: Clinton’s 2016 campaign allegedly cooked up a false Russia-Trump collusion narrative. Dubbed the “Clinton plan intelligence,” this scheme was known to U.S. spy agencies before the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane probe began. Yet, the FBI leaned on Clinton-linked evidence to justify its Trump investigation -- talk about playing dirty.
“The Intelligence Community received the Clinton Plan intelligence in late July 2016,” Durham noted. This revelation, hidden in a classified annex, shows Clinton approved a plan to vilify Trump with Russian interference claims. The swamp’s narrative machine was in overdrive, and the truth was collateral damage.
Former CIA Director John Brennan briefed Barack Obama and others on Aug. 3, 2016, about Clinton’s alleged plot. Shockingly, key Crossfire Hurricane investigators were kept in the dark, with one agent later expressing “a sense of betrayal” upon learning the truth. The FBI’s selective blindness here reeks of political gamesmanship.
CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s July review slammed Brennan for pushing the discredited Steele dossier in the 2016 election assessment. “Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness,” Ratcliffe said. That’s a polite way of saying Brennan peddled fiction to prop up a failing story.
The FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane probe, launched in July 2016, targeted Trump despite knowing Clinton’s collusion claims were dubious. Deceptive FISA warrants against Trump aides like Carter Page and false congressional testimony further muddied the waters. This wasn’t justice—it was a witch hunt with badges.
The probe didn’t stop there; it extended to Mike Flynn in 2017, despite no evidence of wrongdoing. The Steele dossier, riddled with holes, was still included in the intelligence community’s December 2016 assessment over CIA objections. The deep state’s obsession with narrative over facts is glaring.
Fast forward to 2020, and the FBI allegedly ignored intelligence about China’s supposed fake mail-in ballot scheme to boost Joe Biden. With the statute of limitations expiring in August 2025, the Trump team is eyeing a special prosecutor to tackle this. Time’s ticking, but the truth doesn’t have an expiration date.
The Biden campaign’s 2020 dismissal of Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian disinformation, despite FBI validation, adds another layer to the conspiracy. IRS and FBI probes into Hunter’s tax and gun crimes were also stalled, as whistleblowers revealed in 2023. The pattern of selective enforcement is hard to ignore.
Smith’s 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid, conducted over FBI objections, and his appointment as special counsel without Senate confirmation, further fuel the probe. The Mar-a-Lago case was later dismissed, but not before raising eyebrows about political overreach. Smith’s actions look like lawfare, not justice.
The FBI’s investigation may empanel a grand jury outside Washington, D.C., where anti-Trump sentiment runs high, with 92.1% voting against him last election. Florida, where Smith’s Mar-a-Lago raid occurred, is a potential venue, as it falls within the statute of limitations. A former prosecutor called Florida “an intriguing option” for keeping the probe fair.
Declassifying the Grassley and Durham materials could expose the conspiracy’s roots, starting with James Comey’s clearance of Clinton. Grassley’s 2019 letter to William Barr noted the FBI had evidence in May 2016 that demanded further investigation, but it was ignored. This could be the spark that lights the fuse.
Appointing a special prosecutor faces hurdles, with no Senate-confirmed DOJ attorneys available. A Senate-confirmed Cabinet member with prosecutorial experience might step in. The FBI’s silence on the probe only deepens the intrigue, as the nation waits for answers.
