Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) is calling for a formal congressional inquiry into the NFL and NBCUniversal over what he branded an "indecent" Super Bowl LX Halftime Show starring Puerto Rican rapper Bad Bunny. Ogles shared a letter addressed to the House Energy and Commerce Committee on X Monday night, the day after the performance aired to tens of millions of viewers.
He did not mince words.
Pure smut.
That was Ogles's summary of what the NFL chose to beam into American living rooms on Super Bowl Sunday — a show he described as featuring "explicit displays of gay sexual acts, women gyrating provocatively, and Bad Bunny shamelessly grabbing his crotch while dry-humping the air."
The congressman's letter targets the decision-makers, not just the performer. According to Breitbart, Ogles argued it was "highly implausible" that NFL and NBC executives were ignorant of the set's content before it aired. His inquiry demands answers on several fronts:
That last point is the sharpest. Broadcast networks have infrastructure specifically designed to catch content like this. If the safeguards existed and failed, that's incompetence. If they existed and were bypassed, that's a choice — and a far more damning one.
Ogles noted that Bad Bunny's set included songs like "Safaera" and "Yo Perreo Sola," whose lyrics he said "openly glorified sodomy and countless other unspeakable depravities." He argued the sexual content would be "readily apparent across any language barrier" — meaning the Spanish-language lyrics provided no cover. The choreography spoke for itself.
While Ogles took the fight to Capitol Hill, something interesting happened on the charts. Turning Point USA hosted its own "All America Halftime Show" on Sunday night, featuring Kid Rock and country singer Gabby Barrett. By late afternoon the next day, Kid Rock's rendition of "'Til You Can't" had climbed to number one on iTunes. Barrett's "The Good Ones" soared to number four.
Bad Bunny's "Tití Me Preguntó" — one of the songs from the actual halftime show — sat at number five.
The performer who headlined the biggest stage in American entertainment got outpaced on the charts by an alternative show most of the country didn't even know was happening. That's not an organized boycott. That's organic demand. Americans saw what the NFL offered, looked elsewhere, and spent their money accordingly.
This is not the first time the Super Bowl halftime show has sparked backlash, and every time it does, the same pattern unfolds. The network feigns surprise. The NFL hides behind the performer's "artistic vision." And millions of families who sat down to watch a football game are left explaining to their kids what they just saw.
Ogles, whom Trump has previously applauded as a "Conservative Warrior," is asking the right question: not whether Bad Bunny has the right to perform however he wants — he does — but whether the NFL and NBCUniversal exercised any oversight at all over a broadcast that enters American homes without a content warning during what is functionally a national holiday.
The distinction matters. Nobody is calling for censorship. The congressman is calling for accountability from corporations that control the broadcast and profit from it. The NFL chose this performer. NBC approved the broadcast. Somewhere in that chain, adults with decision-making authority reviewed the content — or deliberately chose not to.
Either answer deserves scrutiny.
Whether the House Energy and Commerce Committee takes up Ogles's request remains to be seen. Congressional inquiries into broadcast standards carry weight — the committee has jurisdiction over the FCC and has historically been the venue where broadcast decency questions land.
But even if the inquiry goes nowhere formally, the cultural verdict is already rolling in. Kid Rock outselling the halftime headliner on iTunes tells a story no congressional hearing needs to confirm. Americans aren't asking for a sanitized culture. They're asking for a choice — and when given one, they chose the alternative.
The NFL had every resource to vet that show. Every reason to anticipate the reaction. And every opportunity to apply the standards that supposedly govern network broadcasts. The question isn't whether they could have known. It's whether they cared.