14 GOP Lawmakers Slam Senate’s Bill Revisions

By 
 updated on June 23, 2025

Washington’s latest budget brawl is exposing cracks in GOP unity. Republican leaders are racing to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a multitrillion-dollar package endorsed by President Donald Trump, but Senate revisions have sparked a revolt among House conservatives and Blue-state moderates, Just the News reported.

This isn’t just politics as usual—it’s a conservative clash over principles versus pragmatism.

The House passed the bill in May 2025 after grueling negotiations. Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., brokered deals to win over fiscal hawks and Blue-state Republicans, but Senate changes unraveled those compromises. Now, 14 GOP lawmakers are digging in, threatening to derail the bill by July 4.

Johnson’s House version was a tightrope walk of conservative priorities. It slashed $1.7 trillion in spending to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for a decade, phased out subsidies under the Inflation Reduction Act, and tightened Medicaid and SNAP rules. These cuts thrilled fiscal hawks like Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, who saw it as a bulwark against progressive excess.

House Compromises Win Initial Support

Blue-state Republicans, wary of tax hikes, backed the bill after Johnson capped the state and local tax deduction at $40,000. Reps. Mike Lawler, Nick LaLota, Andrew Garbarino, and Elise Stefanik from New York signed on, securing a narrow House victory. It was a rare moment of GOP unity, however fleeting it may have been.

Then the Senate got its hands on the bill. Committees rewrote key provisions, inflating the debt ceiling raise from $4 trillion to $5 trillion and making tax cuts permanent instead of temporary. These changes, while bold, alienated House members who fought for fiscal restraint.

Senate revisions also gutted the House’s SALT deduction cap, a move that infuriated New York Republicans. Lawler and his allies, once key supporters, now oppose the bill, arguing it betrays their constituents. This flip shows how quickly Senate overreach can fracture GOP coalitions.

Senate Revisions Spark Fiscal Backlash

Fiscal hawks are equally livid about the Senate’s spending spree. The Senate slowed the phaseout of energy subsidies and softened Medicaid work requirements, moves Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., called a “slap in the face” to conservative values. Roy, Norman, Clyde, and Brecheen have vowed to vote no, signaling a House rebellion.

In the Senate, opposition is mounting, too. Senators Ron Johnson, R-Wis., and Rand Paul, R-Ky., are balking at the spending increases, while Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and others worry about a lowered Medicaid provider tax cap hurting rural hospitals. Even with budget reconciliation’s lower vote threshold, passage is no sure thing.

The Senate parliamentarian’s review adds another wrinkle. Some changes may violate the Byrd Rule, potentially stripping them from the bill. This could either save the package or doom it, depending on what survives the chopping block.

Closed-Door Talks Seek Compromise

Johnson and Senate leaders are scrambling to salvage the bill in closed-door talks. They’re wooing holdouts, but the clock is ticking toward the July 4 deadline. Every concession risks alienating another faction, making unity a pipe dream.

The bill’s spending cuts were a hard-won victory for conservatives tired of bloated budgets. Undoing them, as the Senate has, reeks of establishment capitulation to big-government interests. Fiscal hawks aren’t wrong to demand better—they’re fighting the swamp’s endless appetite.

Blue-state Republicans, meanwhile, aren’t just posturing. Their voters face crushing tax burdens, and losing the SALT cap stings. The Senate’s dismissal of their concerns shows a tin ear for regional realities.

July 4 Deadline Looms Large

Trump’s endorsement of the bill adds pressure, but even his clout may not be enough. The MAGA base wants results, not excuses, and a watered-down bill won’t cut it. GOP leaders must decide whether to double down or start over.

The Senate’s tax on university endowments, nixed from the House version, was a populist jab at woke academia. Its removal proves the Senate is more interested in coddling elites than fighting the culture war. Conservatives are right to call foul.

This fight isn’t just about dollars—it’s about the soul of the GOP. Will it stand for fiscal discipline and common-sense tax policy, or cave to Senate dealmakers who dilute the MAGA agenda? By July 4, we’ll know who’s still standing with the base.

About Alex Tanzer

STAY UPDATED

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive exclusive content directly in your inbox